Pescatello
Reports on UK Stem Cell Facilities
On January 15, Paul
Pescatello, president and CEO of CURE, testified before the
Connecticut Stem Cell Advisory Committee in Hartford
about his recent visit to stem cell facilities in the UK.
His testimony is provided below.
Good Afternoon.
Thank you for giving me
this opportunity to report back to you about stem cell
research facilities in the United Kingdom.
Last October, together with
Department of Economic and Community Development
Commissioner Joan McDonald and University of Connecticut
stem cell researcher Marc Lalande, I toured a variety of
stem cell research facilities across the United Kingdom at
the invitation of the UK government.
We were part of a
delegation that included groups from states with innovative
stem cell initiatives.
The other groups in the
delegation included researchers, policy makers and industry
representatives from Maryland/Johns Hopkins University,
Texas/Baylor University, and California and several of
California’s leading research universities.
The delegation was
assembled by the UK government as a means to educate about
the scope and nature of stem cell research in the UK and, in
the process, bring to light potential research
collaborations and investment opportunities.
Our tour began in
Edinburgh.
We visited the University
of Edinburgh and were given an overview of its stem cell
research laboratories by Ian Wilmut. We met with a cross
section of academic researchers, researchers transitioning
into stem cell-related entrepreneurial activities, and
Scottish stem cell research policy advocates.
As was the case throughout
our visit, our meetings also included introductions to and
talks by those charged with ethics oversight.
The University of Edinburgh
and its commitment to stem cell research was impressive. As
it now stands, Ian Wilmut’s Scottish Centre for
Regenerative Medicine is a state-of-the-art facility. More
important, though, is its planned expansion.
We were given a good sense
of its future components and interconnection to other
facilities both at Edinburgh University and around the UK.
We next visited the
University of New Castle. New Castle University, long a
leader in invitro fertilization, has recently opened a new
invitro fertilization facility. This facility is
reported to have the highest rate of success in
world—success as measured by births resulting from
pregnancies resulting from invitro procedures conducted at
the New Castle clinic.
This success rate is due
both to the equipment as well as the systems and protocols
developed in New Castle.
Perhaps more impressive was
the connection—literally and figuratively—of this
fertility clinic to the university stem cell research
laboratories. Both facilities—the invitro
fertilization clinic and stem cell labs—were designed and
built according to Good Manufacturing Practices. Donated
embryos can be transferred seamlessly from the clinic to the
laboratory.
To the extent clinical
opportunities arise from research conducted through these
two GMP facilities, the process involved in getting stem
cell research-derived material into human subjects is
greatly simplified.
We spent considerable time when we were at the New Castle
facilities and also subsequently exploring what it would
take to duplicate the New Castle facilities here in
Connecticut.
The University of
Connecticut’s existing and highly regarded invitro
fertilization clinic and UConn’s planned stem cell
research expansion seem like an ideal site to build upon
what has been accomplished in New Castle.
We took special note that
the New Castle invitro fertilization-stem cell research lab
complex was a custom design.
A means to mass produce it,
so to speak, does not yet exist. This could be a real
opportunity for a Connecticut provider/manufacturer to
replicate New Castle’s design and equipment for
installation at UConn Farmington and also around the world.
We have been working since
our visit to the UK to obtain the specifics about what it
would take to replicate New Castle’s clinic here—both
the manufacturing details and a firm grasp of the costs
involved.
The last portion of our
trip was in London. There we heard presentations by
University of London and Cambridge scientists about their
stem cell research efforts and nascent entrepreneurial
activity.
The ongoing research was
fascinating. One project and start-up company concerns
macular degeneration. We had an interesting exchange
about one of CT’s new biotech start-ups, Optherion, based
in New Haven. Just this summer Optherion raised $37
million, which Optherion has put to work towards its own
macular degeneration R&D.
We hope our contacts in the
UK will cause both research and commercial collaboration
between CT and the UK in the critical field of macular
degeneration treatment.
The presentations in London
were perhaps the most focused on commercial development.
While I was impressed by
the desire and effort to forge commercial applications of UK
stem cell research, I was also somewhat surprised that the
business model for the UK entrepreneurial activities appears
to be based on mining profit—and recouping R&D
expenditures—from the US market, while pricing products
below true cost in the UK and Europe.
I am not confident that
such a strategy will work for the UK—that US venture
capitalists will pour investment into companies and
manufacturing sites based in countries that will not allow
them to price their products according to the market.
At the same time, however,
this certainly raises an opportunity for us to recruit these
companies when they are in later stage clinical
development and, especially, when they are at the
manufacturing stage. |